🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to restart nuclear negotiations with Washington as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi stated only diplomacy worked, and shared new appeals had originated from mediators to resume talks with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran was not yet able to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Path

Araghchi is navigating a challenging route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be operating from a stance of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more powerful in military terms and emotionally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Previous Talks Unexpectedly Ended

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the US president asserting the facilities had been eliminated. Afterward, European countries used their authority to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was agreed an local partnership with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could function inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Representatives stated three times they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the deal to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Status

Tehran representatives declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the offer could be revived in various formats if talks restart.

Trump last week claimed he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to restart talks, but confidentially Iran's diplomats say they are not yet receiving clear proposals from America either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of non-responsiveness in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts diplomacy is not part of a show.

Political Position

In his speech to the conference, aimed to portray the US as a dominant force that abuses the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi said the 12-day war revealed the clash could not be ended by combat operations. He stated the strikes began with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were executed with complete American awareness and coordination, making confidence challenging to restore.

Negotiations Continues the Final Resolution

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had always sought to enforce their demands during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be viable and stays the primary answer to address disagreements, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"Provided that they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will get a response in the identical tone."

Repair and Recovery

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the struggle of recovery and recovery, Araghchi stated he was certain Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We gained numerous insights from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He added: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to destroy, remains in place. The installations and equipment, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is important is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to break. The nation of Iran have become more powerful, more integrated, and more endorsing of the government and the country in the aftermath of this invasion."