🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.